How pharmacy cost savings programs can benefit carriers and policyholders
Auto carriers looking to increase their profitability and combat rising claims costs should scrutinize their pharmacy spend. Without a proactive pharmacy benefits management (PBM) program, carriers might be paying for brand-name medications when generic substitutions are available, or paying for drugs that aren’t related to a claimant’s injuries from a car accident.
All too often in the auto sector, adjusters review pharmacy spend retroactively, reducing the number of opportunities they have to suggest cheaper generic alternatives or scrutinize whether medications are appropriate.
“The important thing is to get ahead of the claim, because eligibility is everything,” Carrier said.
“With many of the cost savings programs, you want to make sure — before you’re providing any type of treatment — that it’s actually associated with the injury that happened in the accident.”
Working with a PBM can help insurers flag whether a medication should be covered by auto, group health, or workers’ compensation benefits. Injury-based formularies can support cost savings, improve turnaround, and reduce adjuster workload by automatically approving medications that are appropriate for patients who have experienced an auto accident and suggesting generic substitutions that can help save money.
“It’s really important that, when a new prescription comes in, the pharmacist attaches it to the right claim — whether it’s a group health, workers’ compensation, or auto claim,” Carrier said. “We’re not allowing a sinus medication to get filled through the auto program. We’re going to block that up front.”
Reducing the pharmaceutical spend on individual claims adds up to large savings for carriers — which they can then pass on to their clients. If carriers are able to lower their premiums thanks to pharmacy cost savings, they’ll attract a greater number of potential policyholders.
“These types of programs are going to save you money and can affect how you set your policy rates from underwriting,” Carrier said.
Adjusters may be apprehensive of PBM programs that help implement pharmacy savings at first, believing that the review process will add more to their already-hefty workloads. “Adjusters are very busy people.
They’re overworked,” Carrier said. “When you bring in a new program like this, the first thing the adjuster thinks of is, ‘Ah, this is more work.’ But that’s not true.”
A PBM should only notify adjusters if a particular pharmaceutical isn’t on the formulary. In those cases, it’ll flag the medication so a claims professional can immediately decide if the drug is appropriate or suggest generic substitutions that can cut costs, saving the company money. This system reduces the strain on adjusters by allowing them to review requests up front, rather than after the prescription was filled, to determine if it’s eligible for reimbursement.
In addition to reducing adjuster workload, these programs can help injured claimants receive coverage for their medications more quickly, often at the point of sale, so they don’t have to worry whether or not a particular prescription is covered. As more and more payers prioritize caring for injured claimants, these services can help carriers attract insureds by making the claims management process as smooth as possible for everyone involved.
“One of the things the auto payers don’t want is to disrupt a claimant getting any drugs that are necessary,” Carrier said. “It’s a program that allows them to go into a pharmacy and get their drugs with no out-of-pocket expense and no hassle.”
Some auto carriers may be concerned that these types of programs are managing care, which is prohibited in all states except New Jersey, but Carrier clarified that this is not the case.
“The adjuster being involved in these types of programs is not managing care,” Carrier said. “These are voluntary programs and they ensure that the policyholders or anybody injured understands that they have this benefit available to them.”